The moral obligation to have genetically related children

Journal of Medical Ethics 51 (4):274-277 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Donor conceived persons are likely to have a lower quality of life than persons who are genetically related to both parents. Empirical evidence is presented to corroborate this point. The evidence is subdivided into three sections: (1) negative experience of the donor conception itself, (2) negative effects of secrecy and openness and (3) negative effects of donor anonymity and donor identifiability. The principle of procreative beneficence requires parents to select the child with the best possible life. Given the difference in quality of life, intended parents should try to have a genetically related child. This finding is also a strong reason for society to invest public resources in the development of techniques that enable people to create genetically related children.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,218

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-09

Downloads
29 (#848,133)

6 months
15 (#202,712)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guido Pennings
University of Ghent

Citations of this work

The Value of Life and Reproductive and Professional Autonomy.Lucy Frith - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-12.

Add more citations