Is a common denominator possible for professional medical ethics?: Commentary on de vries' reflections on a medical ethics for the future

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):139-142 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

reprint Pellegrino, Edmund D. (1982) "Is a common denominator possible for professional medical ethics?: Commentary on De Vries' reflections on a medical ethics for the future". Metamedicine 3(1):139-142

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Medical ethics in the future: Commentary on Andre de vries.Laurence B. McCullough - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):129-133.
The future of medical ethics: A response to Andre de vries.David C. Thomasma - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):125-127.
In ethics a model is important: interview with Professor Edmund D. Pellegrino.Urh Groselj - 2023 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 44 (5):533-538.
Edmund D. Pellegrino festschrift.David C. Thomasma - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2):1-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#316,920)

6 months
6 (#879,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Hippocratic oath.Ludwig Edelstein - 1943 - Baltimore,: The Johns Hopkins press.

Add more references