- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience
New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA. Edited by Dennis M. Patterson (2013)
Abstract
This book addresses the philosophical questions that arise when neuroscientific research and technology are applied in the legal system. The empirical, practical, ethical, and conceptual issues that Pardo and Patterson seek to redress will deeply influence how we negotiate and implement the fruits of neuroscience in law and policy in the future.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Michael Pardo and Dennis Patterson, Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience.Stephen J. Morse - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (1):158-163.
Michael S Pardo and Dennis Patterson, Minds, Brains, and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience : Science and Law 101: Bringing Clarity to Pardo and Patterson's Confused Conception of the Conceptual Confusion in Law and Neuroscience. [REVIEW]David L. Faigman - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (1):171-180.
Book Review: Minds, Brains, and the Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience. [REVIEW]Karen Breda - unknown
Applying Confirmation Theory to the Case against Neurolaw.Anton Donchev - 2018 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):45-54.
Law and neuroscience.Owen D. Jones - 2014 - New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. Edited by Jeffrey D. Schall & Francis X. Shen.
Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience.Dennis Michael Patterson & Michael S. Pardo (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-01-12
Downloads
14 (#1,273,358)
6 months
4 (#1,246,333)
2016-01-12
Downloads
14 (#1,273,358)
6 months
4 (#1,246,333)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.John Danaher - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2023-2049.
Identifying Criteria for the Evaluation of the Implications of Brain Reading for Mental Privacy.Giulio Mecacci & Pim Haselager - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (2):443-461.
Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity.Thomas Douglas & Lisa Forsberg - 2021 - In S. Ligthart, D. van Toor, T. Kooijmans, T. Douglas & G. Meynen (eds.), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice and Security. Palgrave Macmillan.
Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.Ariane Bigenwald & Valerian Chambon - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-zvk2b uwo