Human Gene Patents and the Question of Liberal Morality

Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (3):1-19 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the establishment of the Human Genome Project and the identification of genes in human DNA that play a role in human diseases and disorders, a long, moral and political, battle has began over the extension of IPRs to information contained in human genetic material. According to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, over the past 20 years, large numbers of human genes have been the subject of thousands of patent applications. This paper examines whether human gene patents can be justified in terms of liberal theories of morality such as natural law, personality development, just reward and social utility. It is argued that human gene patents are in conflict with fundamental principles of liberal morality and justice because they result in "genetic information feudalism".

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gene Patents—A Pharmaceutical Perspective.Jack L. Tribble - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):429-432.
The morality of human Gene patents.David B. Resnik - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (1):43-61.
Ethics and the patenting of human genes.Annabelle Lever - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 1:31-46.
What's So Special about the Human Genome?Arthur L. Caplan - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):422-424.
Introduction.Myles W. Jackson - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (1):1-12.
Should Human Genes Be Patented?David K. Chan - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):30-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
21 (#1,028,363)

6 months
9 (#480,402)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.Jeremy Bentham - 1780 - New York: Dover Publications. Edited by J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart.
Two treatises of government.John Locke - 1953 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Laslett.

View all 34 references / Add more references