What's So Special about the Human Genome?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):422-424 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Glenn McGee argues that the time is now for debating the morality of patenting human genes. In one sense he is surely right. While thousands of patents have been issued or are pending on many gene sequences, public policy with respect to ownership of the human genome is still far from settled. So a debate about the ethics of patenting genes is, if nothing else, timely. In another sense however, Professor McGee is wrong

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gene Patents—A Pharmaceutical Perspective.Jack L. Tribble - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):429-432.
Human Gene Patents and Human Dignity.Stephanie H. To - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (2):265-285.
Should Human Genes Be Patented?David K. Chan - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):30-36.
Ethics and the patenting of human genes.Annabelle Lever - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 1:31-46.
Disease Genes Are Not Patentable: A Rebuttal of McGee.Jon F. Merz & Mildred K. Cho - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):425-428.
Human Gene Patents and the Question of Liberal Morality.Theo Papaioannou - 2008 - Genomics, Society and Policy 4 (3):1-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
98 (#214,749)

6 months
17 (#170,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arthur L. Caplan
New York University

References found in this work

Gene Patents Can Be Ethical.Glenn Mcgee - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):417-421.

Add more references