Is There A Logic of the Ineffable? Or, How Is it Possible to Talk About the Unsayable?

In Nahum Brown & J. Aaron Simmons (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Negative Theology and Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 71-80 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter defends a single, fixed, definite answer to the question: Is there a logic that governs the unsayable? The proposed answer is: “Yes, and no. Or yes-but-not-yes. And/or yes-no.” Each component of this answer is examined and used to generate three laws of what I call “synthetic logic”, which correspond directly to the laws of classical (Aristotelian) logic: the law of contradiction (“A=-A”), the law of non-identity (“A≠A”), and the law of the included middle (“-(Av-A)”). We can talk about the unsayable only by assuming that propositions constructed in accordance with these three alternative logical laws can be meaningful.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-16

Downloads
501 (#57,039)

6 months
117 (#47,817)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen R. Palmquist
Hong Kong Baptist University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references