Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect

Cognition 106 (1):528-537 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,750

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Imperator of AMORC: An Interview with Gary L. Stewart.Jay Kinney & Timothy O'Neill - 1989 - Gnosis: A Journal of the Western Inner Traditions 12:33-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
73 (#294,439)

6 months
13 (#229,718)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Inner Speech.Peter Langland-Hassan - 2021 - WIREs Cognitive Science 12 (2):e1544.
A Gricean Theory of Malaprops.Elmar Unnsteinsson - 2017 - Mind and Language 32 (4):446-462.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The imagery debate: Analog media vs. tacit knowledge.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1981 - Psychological Review 88 (December):16-45.
Monitoring and self-repair in speech.W. Levelt - 1983 - Cognition 14 (1):41-104.
Can mental images be ambiguous?D. Chambers & Daniel Reisberg - 1985 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 11:317-28.

View all 7 references / Add more references