Animal liberation versus environmentalism

Environmental Ethics 22 (2):183-190 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animal liberationism and environmentalism generally are considered incompatible positions. But, properly conceived, they simply provide answers to different questions, concerning moral standing and intrinsic value, respectively. The two views together constitute an environmental ethic that combines environmental justice and environmental care. I show that this approach is not only consistent but defensible

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal Liberation is an Environmental Ethic.Dale Jamieson - 1998 - Environmental Values 7 (1):41-57.
The Edge of “Animal Rights”.Yajun Sun - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (5):543-557.
‘Back Together Again’ Again.J. Baird Callicott - 1998 - Environmental Values 7 (4):461-475.
Humean Nature.Alan Carter - 2000 - Environmental Values 9 (1):3-37.
Animal Liberation. [REVIEW]L. W. Sumner - 1979 - Environmental Ethics 1 (4):365-370.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
79 (#265,091)

6 months
9 (#485,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Animal ethics and interest conflicts.Elisa Aaltola - 2005 - Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):19-48.
Seeing Animals, Speaking of Nature.Mimei Ito - 2008 - Theory, Culture and Society 25 (4):119-137.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references