Review of Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge [Book Review]

Abstract

In this book, Stephen Hetherington attacks what he thinks are two "dogmas" of epistemology. One he calls "epistemic absolutism" which amounts to the claim that knowledge is absolute: you can be with or without it, but once you have it, it is not possible to have more or less. The other is "justificationalism" which is the view that some sort of justification is necessary for knowledge

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,902

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-19

Downloads
15 (#1,224,800)

6 months
5 (#1,025,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erik J. Olsson
Lund University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references