- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Good knowledge, bad knowledge: on two dogmas of epistemology
New York: Oxford University Press (2001)
Abstract
What is knowledge? How hard is it for a person to have knowledge? Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge confronts contemporary philosophical attempts to answer those classic questions, offering a theory of knowledge that is unique in conceiving of knowledge in a non-absolutist way.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology.Bruce W. Brower - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):107-108.
Recensioni/Reviews-Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge. On Two Dogmas of Epistemology. [REVIEW]S. Hetherington & J. L. Camp - 2004 - Epistemologia 27 (2):353.
Review of Stephen Hetherington, Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology. [REVIEW]Richard Feldman - 2002 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (8).
Knowledge and Governing Well.Gerasimos Santas - 2010 - In Understanding Plato's Republic. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 120–157.
A Knowledge-First Account of Group Knowledge.Domingos Faria - 2022 - Logos and Episteme 13 (1):37-53.
Sharing Knowledge: A Functionalist Account of Assertion.Christoph Kelp & Mona Simion - 2021 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mona Simion.
Knowledge in Contemporary Philosophy.Markos Valaris & Stephen Hetherington (eds.) - 2018 - London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
189 (#128,680)
6 months
6 (#838,367)
2009-01-28
Downloads
189 (#128,680)
6 months
6 (#838,367)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Express Knowledge Account of Assertion.John Turri - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):37-45.
What's the Point of Understanding?Michael Hannon - 2019 - In What's the Point of Knowledge? A Function-First Epistemology. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-4qrhw uwo