O Arcaísmo da Substancialidade No Escrito da Diferença de Hegel

Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 64 (156):729-747 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that one of the reasons for Hegel’s failure in consummating the project of “construct the absolute for consciousness” presented in 1801 in his Writing on Difference consisted in the patent mismatch between the negativity to which the determinations of finitude would be submitted and the conception of the absolute still substantially thought. Precisely, what we call here the archaism of substantiality would set the tone of this mismatch that still entailed the heterogeneity between finitude, with its way of ascending to the absolute, and the absolute itself. Among other things, this will become clearer observing the formalism of the intuitionist proposal that Hegel presents at that time, aiming to safeguard the elevation of consciousness without its intrinsic negativity tainting the absolutity of the principle to which it was elevated.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hegel's Absolute as Negativity.Mazdak Rajabi - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 15 (36):369-383.
La negatividad de Kant a Hegel: juicio estético y lenguaje especulativo”.Berta M. Pérez - 2017 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 50:187-206.
Hegel and the Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity.Brady Bowman - 2013 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Abolition of Time in Hegel's "Absolute Knowing".Jacob Blumenfeld - 2013 - Idealistic Studies 43 (1-2):111-119.
Finite Freedom and its split from the Absolute in Schelling’s Bruno.Juan José Rodríguez - 2024 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 66 (2):93-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-13

Downloads
12 (#1,368,341)

6 months
7 (#704,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Briefe von und an Hegel.J. Hoffmeister - 1972 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 162:359-362.
Fonti spinoziane della dialettica di Hegel.Leo Lugarini - 1982 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 36 (139/140):21.
Substanz und subjekt.Walter Jaeschke - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (3):439-458.

Add more references