Relieving Pain and Foreseeing Death: A Paradox about Accountability and Blame

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (1):19-25 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a familiar moral dilemma faced by physicians who care for the dying, some patients who are within days or hours of death may experience suffering in a degree that cannot be relieved by ordinary levels of analgesia. In such cases, it may sometimes be possible to honor a competent patient's request for pain relief only by giving an injection of narcotics in a dosage so large that the patient's death is thereby hastened. Doctors rightly worry that taking an action likely to result in a patient's death may violate the Hippocratic injunction against the direct killing of anyone in their care.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
95 (#233,758)

6 months
6 (#697,129)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susana Nuccetelli
St. Cloud State University

Citations of this work

Commentary: Double Effect—Intention is the Solution, Not the Problem.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (1):26-29.
The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?R. M. Perkin - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):164-169.
Islam and palliative care.K. A. Choong - 2015 - Global Bioethics 26 (1):28-42.

Add more citations