The “babe” vegetarians: Bioethics, animal minds and moral methodology

Abstract

“The fact is that animals that don't seem to have a purpose really do have a purpose. The Bosses have to eat. It's probably the most noble purpose of all, when you come to think about it.” – Cat, “Babe”.

Other Versions

original Nobis, Nathan (2009) "The Babe Vegetarians". In Shapshay, Sandra, Bioethics at the movies, pp. 56: Johns Hopkins University Press (2009)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Babe Vegetarians.Nathan Nobis - 2009 - In Sandra Shapshay (ed.), Bioethics at the movies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 56.
Animal Rights.Jan Narveson - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):161 - 178.
Why Veganism Matters: The Moral Value of Animals.Gary L. Francione - 2020 - New York: Columbia University Press.
The Philosophy of Animal Minds.Robert W. Lurz (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Carnivore Strikes Back.L. W. Sumner - 1984 - Dialogue 23 (4):661-668.
Commitment: some formal interpretations.Daniel Rönnedal - 2012 - Disputatio 4 (33):445 - 457.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#764,486)

6 months
29 (#117,562)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Nobis
Morehouse College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references