Adam's place in nature: Respect or domination?

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (2):102-113 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The creation story in Genesis speaks of humankind being given dominion over nature. Does this support the view that nature has solely instrumental value, and is of worth only insofar as it serves the necessities and conveniences of the human species? Does dominion amount to unfettered domination here? An interpretation of the story is advanced employing procedures of practical criticism. Three central images are focussed on: Adam's being given dominion over the other creatures, his naming of them, and his being made in God's likeness. It is argued that these images, in their qualification and enrichment of each other, develop the idea that animals are of worth independently of their usefulness to us. Other key parts of the Bible, that at first may seem to promote unfettered domination, are shown to be more properly read as supporting an animal-benign religious ethics.

Other Versions

reprint Nash, Roger (1990) "Adam's place in nature: Respect or domination?". Journal of Agricultural Ethics 3(2):102-113

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
58 (#372,249)

6 months
10 (#423,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Everyman's Talmud.Abraham Cohen - 1934 - New York,: E. P. Dutton.

Add more references