Le Trois Modes de Domination et la Mere dans De Cive et Leviathan de Hobbes

In Yves Charles Zarka & Liang Pang, Hobbes : Le pouvoir entre domination et resistance. Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin. pp. 39-57. Translated by Cecile Housset (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While not ignored, the question of the role of mothers in the schema of political rule in Hobbes is not often taken up. Distinct from his contemporaries, Hobbes acknowledges only minimal differences between men and women, and argues that, because maternal protection and nourishment are necessary for its survival, the mother dominates the infant in the state of nature. How to explain that the mother loses this power of domination in the social or political order? Hobbes does not explicitly say. However, some possibilities can be extracted from his texts. Here, I will attempt to explain the loss of maternal power by examining Hobbes's discourse on the different modes of dominion and political rule in "De Cive" and "Leviathan." I will concentrate on their differences, drawing from Yves Charles Zarka's reading of them. Then I will approach the question of the mother and her position in the hierarchy of servitude in each of these texts, appealing to Carole Pateman's analyses as well as Zarka's. Finally, I will present what role the mother's dominion over her children plays in Hobbes's schema.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition" by Jean Hampton. [REVIEW]Paul Russell - 1989 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (4):620.
I Professed to Write Not All to All.Eva Helene Odzuck - 2017 - Hobbes Studies 30 (2):123-155.
The Sovereign and the Social.Annelies Degryse - 2008 - Ethical Perspectives 15 (2):239-258.
The science in Hobbes's politics.Tom Sorell - 1988 - In Graham Alan John Rogers & Alan Ryan, Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rethinking the sexual contract: The case of Thomas Hobbes.Lorenzo Rustighi - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (3):274-301.
Mimesis in Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan.Laura S. Reagan - 2012 - History of the Human Sciences 25 (4):25-42.
Thomas Hobbes and the natural law tradition.Norberto Bobbio - 1993 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hobbes and Psychological Egoism.Bernard Gert - 1967 - Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (4):503-520.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
477 (#63,190)

6 months
111 (#54,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Griffith
Middle East Technical University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references