Commentary: False Positives in the Diagnosis of Brain Death

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (4):648-656 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brain Death False Positives Reliably Track What Matters in Brain Death Cases.Eli Weber - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):285-286.
Meaningful Residual Function, Permanence and Brain Death.Ramesh K. Batra & Stephen R. Latham - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):269-271.
What sort of death matters?Rebecca Roache - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (11):727-728.
Maybe Whole-Brain Death Was Never the Point.Stephen S. Hanson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):277-279.
Certainty, Science, and the Brain-Based Definition of Death.Dominique E. Martin, Cynthia Forlini & Emma Tumilty - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (3):279-282.
Commentary: Defining Death: Definitions, Criteria, and Tests.Robert D. Truog - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (4):642-647.
“Brain Death,” “Dead,” and Parental Denial.John J. Paris, Brian M. Cummings & M. Patrick Moore - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (4):371-382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-18

Downloads
27 (#864,536)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Franklin Miller
Columbia University
Michael Nair-Collins
Florida State University