Is Geometry Analytic?

Dianoia 1 (4):66 - 78 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I present critical evaluations of Ayer and Putnam's views on the analyticity of geometry. By drawing on the historico-philosophical work of Michael Friedman on the relativized apriori; and Roberto Torretti on the foundations of geometry, I show how we can make sense of the assertion that pure geometry is analytic in Carnap's sense.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-29

Downloads
1,590 (#10,919)

6 months
129 (#48,104)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Mwakima
University of Colorado, Boulder

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reconsidering Logical Positivism.Michael Friedman - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Summa Contra Gentiles.Thomas Aquinas - 1975 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Point and line to plane.Wassily Kandinsky - 1926 - New York: Dover Publications. Edited by Hilla Rebay.
The Formalities of Omniscience.A. N. Prior - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (140):114 - 129.
On Divine Foreknowledge: Part IV of the Concordia.Alfred J. Freddoso (ed.) - 1988 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references