La especificidad del discurso moral en Kant

Isegoría 50:353-370 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

El objetivo del presente artículo es mostrar cómo la especificidad del discurso moral obliga a introducir un modo de exposición de nuestros conceptos que no acaba de ajustarse plenamente a ninguno de los dos modelos presentados por Kant en el parágrafo 59 de la Crítica de la facultad de juzgar. Situándose a medio camino de esquema y símbolo, la noción de «tipo» actúa como elemento mediador entre la ley moral y cada una de sus posibles concreciones

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,951

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-22

Downloads
34 (#750,856)

6 months
14 (#239,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Categorical Imperative.Stuart M. Brown & H. J. Paton - 1949 - Philosophical Review 58 (6):599 - 611.
Kants kategorischer Imperativ als Kriterium des Sittlichen.Otfried Höffe - 1977 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 31 (3):354 - 384.
The Schematism and Empirical Concepts.R. B. Pippin - 1976 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 67 (2):156.
Kant on Meaning: Two Studies.J. P. Nolan - 1979 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 70 (2):113.

View all 14 references / Add more references