- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What Genes Can't Do
MIT Press (2003)
Abstract
A historical and critical analysis of the concept of the gene that attempts to provide new perspectives and metaphors for the transformation of biology and its philosophy.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Moss, Lenny. What genes can't do.Pascal Borry - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):75-77.
Book review: Lenny Moss (2003). What genes can't do. [REVIEW]Pieter Lemmens - 2003 - Acta Biotheoretica 51 (2):141-150.
Lenny Moss, What Genes Can't Do. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003. [REVIEW]Karola C. Stotz - 2003 - Metascience 12 (3):414-417.
Lenny Moss, What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press , 256 pp., $21.00. [REVIEW]Alan C. Love - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (2):247-250.
Book Reviews Lenny Moss, What Genes Can’t Do, Series on Basic Bioethics, no. 6 , xx + 228 pp., illus., $34.95, $20.00 paper. [REVIEW]Doris T. Zallen - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):383-384.
Review of Lenny Moss, What Genes Can't Do. [REVIEW]Jonathan Michael Kaplan - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (8).
What Genes Can't Do: Prolegomena to a Post Modern-Synthesis Philosophy.Lenny Moss - 1998 - Dissertation, Northwestern University
Book reviews: The Society of Cells : Cancer and Control of Cell Proliferation and What Genes Can't Do. [REVIEW]Adam S. Wilkins - 2004 - Bioessays 26 (8):926-927.
The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives.Peter J. Beurton, Raphael Falk & Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-02
Downloads
12 (#1,369,278)
6 months
3 (#1,470,638)
2015-02-02
Downloads
12 (#1,369,278)
6 months
3 (#1,470,638)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Ontic Account of Scientific Explanation.Carl F. Craver - 2014 - In Marie I. Kaiser, Oliver R. Scholz, Daniel Plenge & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Explanation in the special science: The case of biology and history. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 27-52.
When Traditional Essentialism Fails: Biological Natural Kinds.Robert A. Wilson, Matthew J. Barker & Ingo Brigandt - 2007 - Philosophical Topics 35 (1-2):189-215.
The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology.Daniel J. Nicholson - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (5):347-359.
The Epistemic Goal of a Concept: Accounting for the Rationality of Semantic Change and Variation.Ingo Brigandt - 2010 - Synthese 177 (1):19-40.
Scientific Pluralism.Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (eds.) - 1956 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-g6qm9 uwo