- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
STS and Bioethics: Forging New Synergies for Exploring the Potentials and Pitfalls of Public Engagement with New Biotechnologies
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):72-74 (2023)
Abstract
In this commentary for Conley et al. (2023), we seek to bridge the gap that, unfortunately, still often exists between debates in Science & Technology Studies (STS) and Bioethics. We believe that t...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Public Engagement in Shaping Bioethics Policy: Reasons for Skepticism.Rosamond Rhodes & Gary Ostertag - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):68-72.
Translational Justice in Human Gene Editing: Bringing End User Engagement and Policy Together.Megan A. Allyse, Karen M. Meagher, Marsha Michie, Rosario Isasi, Kelly E. Ormond, Natasha Bonhomme, Yvonne Bombard, Heidi Howard, Kiran Musunuru, Kirsten A. Riggan & Sabina Rubeck - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):55-58.
For Analytics Beyond “Personhood,” Bioethics Should Look Toward Science and Technology Studies (STS).Vishnu Subrahmanyam, Alberto Aparicio, Jacob D. Moses & Stephen Molldrem - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):46-48.
Deliberative Mini-Publics and Equity: Procedural Benefits and Promising Outcomes for Gene Editing.Naomi Scheinerman - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):74-76.
Reflections on Reflexive Engagement: Response to Nowotny and Wynne.Andrew Webster - 2007 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 32 (5):608-615.
Rethinking the “Public” and Rethinking “Engagement”.Brandy Fox & Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):66-68.
The Australian Citizens’ Jury and Global Citizens’ Assembly on Genome Editing.Dianne Nicol, John Stanley Dryzek, Simon Niemeyer, Nicole Curato & Rebecca Paxton - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):61-63.
From 'Implications' to 'Dimensions': Science, Medicine and Ethics in Society. [REVIEW]Martyn D. Pickersgill - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):31-42.
Feminist Concerns About Artificial Womb Technology.Tamara Kayali Browne, Evie Kendal & Tiia Sudenkaarne - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):97-99.
The Need for Public Intellectuals: A Space for STS: Pre-Presidential Address, Annual Meeting 2001, Cambridge, MA.Wiebe E. Bijker - 2003 - Science, Technology and Human Values 28 (4):443-450.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-22
Downloads
32 (#708,450)
6 months
5 (#1,047,105)
2023-06-22
Downloads
32 (#708,450)
6 months
5 (#1,047,105)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Promise and Reality of Public Engagement in the Governance of Human Genome Editing Research.John M. Conley, R. Jean Cadigan, Arlene M. Davis, Eric T. Juengst, Kriste Kuczynski, Rami Major, Hayley Stancil, Julio Villa-Palomino, Margaret Waltz & Gail E. Henderson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):9-16.
Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement.Ulrike Felt & Maximilian Fochler - 2010 - Minerva 48 (3):219-238.
Lay Discourses of Science: Science-in-General, Science-in-Particular, and Self.Mike Michael - 1992 - Science, Technology and Human Values 17 (3):313-333.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-82spv uwo