- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics
Connection Science 29 (2):137-141 (2017)
Abstract
While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of 5 rules of what ‘should’ be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Robots of Just War: A Legal Perspective.Ugo Pagallo - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):307-323.
When Morals Ain’t Enough: Robots, Ethics, and the Rules of the Law.Ugo Pagallo - 2017 - Minds and Machines 27 (4):625-638.
Ethics and Robotics.Raphael Capurro & Michael Nagenborg (eds.) - 2009 - Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
Temptations in the office: ethical choices and legal obligations.Stephen M. Goldman - 2008 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Can Rules Ground Moral Obligations?Luke Robinson - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
The Trolley Problem and Isaac Asimov’s First Law of Robotics.Erik Persson & Maria Hedlund - 2024 - Journal of Science Fiction and Philosophy 7.
The Ties that Bind: An Analysis of the Concept of Obligation.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (1):16-46.
A culture of their own? culture in robot-robot interaction.Masoumeh Mansouri & Henry Taylor - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-11.
Legal and Ethical Commentary: The Dangers of Reading Duty Too Broadly.Ellen Wright Clayton - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (1):19-21.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-01-04
Downloads
1,020 (#20,072)
6 months
139 (#34,786)
2017-01-04
Downloads
1,020 (#20,072)
6 months
139 (#34,786)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Just War and Robots’ Killings.Thomas W. Simpson & Vincent C. Müller - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):302-22.
Robots and Respect: Assessing the Case Against Autonomous Weapon Systems.Robert Sparrow - 2016 - Ethics and International Affairs 30 (1):93-116.
Autonomous killer robots are probably good news.Vincent C. Müller - 2016 - In Ezio Di Nucci & Filippo Santoni de Sio (eds.), Drones and Responsibility: Legal, Philosophical and Socio-Technical Perspectives on the Use of Remotely Controlled Weapons. Routledge. pp. 67-81.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-kkgnk uwo