Thoughts, oughts and the conceptual primacy of belief

Analysis 68 (3):234-238 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No Abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/68.3.234

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Oughts and thoughts: rule-following and the normativity of content.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Thoughts on Oughts.Stephen Anderson - 2013 - Philosophy Now 99:26-29.
Unbelievable thoughts and doxastic oughts.Adam C. Podlaskowski - 2010 - Theoria 76 (2):112-118.
Oughts and thoughts: Rule-following and the normativity of content – Anandi Hattiangadi. [REVIEW]Daniel Whiting - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):743-745.
Oughts and Thoughts: Rule‐Following and the Normativity of Content, by Anandi Hattiangadi. [REVIEW]Tim Kraft - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):336-341.
Dose the Conceptual Interdependency of Belief and Desire Undermine the Normativity of Content?Seyed Ali Kalantari - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 9 (17):95-103.
The Deontic Primacy of Actions?Andrew T. Forcehimes - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy 120 (10):521-549.
Truth promoting non-evidential reasons for belief.Brian Talbot - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):599-618.
The argument for internalism: Reply to Miller.Michael Smith - 1996 - Analysis 56 (3):175–184.
Some more thoughts on semantic oughts: A reply to Daniel Whiting.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2009 - Analysis 69 (1):54-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
122 (#183,814)

6 months
15 (#180,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander B. Miller
The Catholic University of America

Citations of this work

Interlocking content and attitude: a reply to the anti-normativist.Javier González de Prado & Víctor M. Verdejo - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (10):1051-1072.
Disbelieving the Normativity of Content.Víctor M. Verdejo - 2014 - Acta Analytica 29 (4):441-456.
A verisimilitudinarian analysis of the Linda paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic operators.Fred I. Dretske - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (24):1007-1023.
Epistemic Operators.Fred Dretske - 1999 - In Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield, Skepticism: Contemporary Readings. New York: Oxford University Press.
The normativity of content.Paul A. Boghossian - 2003 - Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.
Does thought imply ought?Krister Bykvist & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2007 - Analysis 67 (4):277–285.
Transmission Failure Failure.Nicholas Silins - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):71-102.

View all 11 references / Add more references