Some more thoughts on semantic oughts: A reply to Daniel Whiting

Analysis 69 (1):54-63 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. IntroductionA considerable number of philosophers maintain that meaning is intrinsically normative. In this journal, Daniel Whiting has defended the normativity of meaning against some of my recent objections . 1 This paper responds to Whiting's arguments

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/ann009

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,987

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On Some Objections to the Normativity of Meaning.Mindaugas Gilaitis - 2022 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk & Martin Hinton, Philosophical Approaches to Language and Communication (vol 2). Peter Lang. pp. 269-289.
Oughts and thoughts: rule-following and the normativity of content.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A range of reasons.Daniel Star & Stephen Kearns - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-16.
The normativity of meaning defended.Daniel Whiting - 2007 - Analysis 67 (2):133-140.
Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content, by Anandi Hattiangadi.: Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Hannah Ginsborg - 2010 - Mind 119 (476):1175-1186.
In Defense of the Kantian Account of Knowledge: Reply to Whiting.Mark Schroeder - 2015 - Logos and Episteme 6 (3): 371-382.
Normativity and correctness: A reply to Hattiangadi. [REVIEW]Andrei Buleandra - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (2):177-186.
Oughts and thoughts: Rule-following and the normativity of content – Anandi Hattiangadi. [REVIEW]Daniel Whiting - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):743-745.
Schroeder and Whiting on Knowledge and Defeat.Javier González de Prado Salas - 2016 - Logos and Episteme 7 (2):231-238.
Oughts and Thoughts: Rule‐Following and the Normativity of Content, by Anandi Hattiangadi. [REVIEW]Tim Kraft - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):336-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-23

Downloads
334 (#87,358)

6 months
7 (#477,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anandi Hattiangadi
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Is Meaning Fraught with Ought?Daniel Whiting - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):535-555.
Anti-Normativism Evaluated.Ulf Hlobil - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (3):376-395.
The Austerity Framework and semantic normativity.Mark Pinder - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 64 (1-2):123-141.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Normative requirements.John Broome - 1999 - Ratio 12 (4):398–419.
The normativity of content.Paul A. Boghossian - 2003 - Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.
Does thought imply ought?Krister Bykvist & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2007 - Analysis 67 (4):277–285.
Is meaning normative?Anandi Hattiangadi - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (2):220-240.

View all 14 references / Add more references