The Role of Freedom in Descartes' Ethics of Belief

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (2):218-245 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article brings to light the role and importance of Descartes' concept of freedom for his ethics of belief. For Descartes, I argue, correctly assigning epistemic praise/blame means tracking authentic freedoms: ascertaining whether an act of assent is spontaneous or perverse both before and after eliciting the act of will. Authentic spontaneity ensures that the agent receives praise for his epistemic accomplishment, which includes the right results as well as the right order of steps. Authentic perversity leads to the agent being blamed for not accepting the truth while fully aware of the gravity of the gesture

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Every Belief is a Choice: Descartes’ Doxastic Voluntarism Reconsidered.Mark Boespflug - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 31 (2):158-178.
Interpreting Descartes Algebraically.Jamie Anne Spiering - 2021 - International Philosophical Quarterly 61 (2):175-187.
Perversity.L. S. Carrier - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (104):229-242.
Epistemic Value and the New Evil Demon.B. J. C. Madison - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1):89-107.
Leaps of Knowledge.Andrew Reisner - 2013 - In Timothy Hoo Wai Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 167-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-03

Downloads
43 (#518,702)

6 months
3 (#1,470,638)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references