Posthumous ‘Punishment’: What May Be Done About Criminal Wrongs After the Wrongdoer’s Death?

Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (2):313-329 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The commission of criminal wrongs is occasionally revealed after the wrongdoer’s death. In such cases, there seems to be a widely-shared intuition, which also frequently motivates many people’s actions, that the dead should still be blamed and that some response, not only stemming from civil society but also the state, to the criminal wrong is necessary. This article explores the possibility of posthumous blame and punishment by the state. After highlighting the deficiencies of the pure versions of retributivism and general deterrence theory, but also the potential in the latter, it argues for a political theory of the criminal law, which views institutions of punishment as the business not only of defendants and victims but also the political community as a whole. Within this normative scheme posthumous responses to wrongs are possible and in some cases necessary for the maintenance of the stability of the political community. Accountability-holding processes may also be possible and necessary for the protection of the reputation of the deceased suspected wrongdoer.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-25

Downloads
45 (#494,018)

6 months
6 (#862,561)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Facts and Values.Peter Railton - 1986 - Philosophical Topics 14 (2):5-31.
Posthumous harm.Dorothy Grover - 1989 - Philosophical Quarterly 39 (156):334-353.

Add more references