“A Rose is a Rose”: On Producing Legal Gender Classifications

Gender and Society 24 (6):814-837 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gender is perhaps the most pervasive, fundamental, and universally accepted way we separate and categorize human beings. Yet in recent years, U.S. courts and administrative state agencies have confronted a growing challenge from individuals demanding to have their gender reclassified. Transgender people create a profound category crisis for social institutions built on the idea that biological sex is both immutable and dichotomous. During the past four decades, the central legal question shifted from how to allocate specific individuals to categories to the permeability of gender categories themselves. This analysis of 38 judicial gender determinations provides a glimpse of the literal construction of the gender order and of the ways institutions gender individuals. It also provides powerful evidence that cultural anxieties about reproduction and the heterosexual, conjugal family underscore institutional efforts to manage the uncertainty of postmodern gender identities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gender: to Deconstruct or Not to Deconstruct?Evangelia Aikaterini Glantzi - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 29:45-49.
The gender regimes as reflection of power relations.Eleonora K. Skyba - 2015 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 7:103-110.
The Metaphysics of Gender.Natalie Stoljar - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 211–223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
16 (#1,196,523)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?