Studies in Hegelian Cosmology

New York: Cambridge University Press (1901)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John McTaggart was a Cambridge philosopher, famous for his metaphysical theory that time is not real and that temporal order is an illusion. Although best known for his contributions to the philosophy of time, McTaggart also spent a large part of his career expounding Hegel's work. In this book, first published in 1901, he discusses which views on a range of topics in metaphysics and ethics are compatible with Hegel's logic and idea of 'the Absolute'. Some early work on theories for which McTaggart later became well known can be found in this work, such as his beliefs that humans are immortal, that the Absolute is not in any sense a person, and that love is the relation that binds people together. In this book he also discusses punishment, sin, morality and whether Hegel could be considered a Christian.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Studies in Hegelian Cosmology.John Mac Taggart & Ellis Mac Taggart - 1902 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 10 (1):8-9.
VI.—Mr. McTaggart's “Studies in Hegelian Cosmology”.G. E. Moore - 1902 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 2 (1):177-214.
Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic.John McTaggart Ellis McTaggart - 1896 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Bradley and McTaggart on Time.David J. Farmer - 1996 - Bradley Studies 2 (2):104-116.
McTaggart on time.Nathaniel Goldberg - 2004 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 13:71-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#533,351)

6 months
6 (#862,561)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

British Hegelianism: A Non‐Metaphysical View?Robert Stern - 1994 - European Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):293-321.
Bernard Bosanquet.William Sweet - 2008; 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What's so good about the absolute?W. J. Mander - 1996 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1):101 – 118.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references