Why intentional systems theory cannot reconcile physicalism with realism about belief and desire

ProtoSociology 14:145-157 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I examine Daniel Dennett’s well-known intentional systems theory of belief and desire from the perspective of physicalism. I begin with a general discussion of physicalism. In the course of that discussion, I present familiar ways that one might attempt to reconcile physicalism with belief-desire realism. I then argue that intentional systems theory will not provide a reconciliation of physicalism and belief-desire realism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychosemantics and its Thematic Duality.Rui Zhu - 1997 - Dissertation, Tulane University
Dennett's little grains of salt.Gregory McCulloch - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (158):1-12.
Wants and desires: A critique of conativist theory of motivation.Chris Meyers - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research:357-370.
Illusionism's discontent.Katalin Balog - 2016 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (11-12):40-51.
Physicalism and the Part-Whole Relation.Andreas Hüttemann - 2015 - In Tomasz Bigaj & Christian Wüthrich (eds.), Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Boston: Brill | Rodopi. pp. 323-344.
A theory of emotion.Joel Marks - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 42 (1):227-242.
The inconsistent scientific realist.Sandra Harding - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (3):203 - 205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#393,991)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian P. McLaughlin
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references