The Physical Mandate for Belief-Goal Psychology

Minds and Machines 30 (1):23-45 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article describes a heuristic argument for understanding certain physical systems in terms of properties that resemble the beliefs and goals of folk psychology. The argument rests on very simple assumptions. The core of the argument is that predictions about certain events can legitimately be based on assumptions about later events, resembling Aristotelian ‘final causation’; however, more nuanced causal entities must be introduced into these types of explanation in order for them to remain consistent with a causally local Universe.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erratum.[author unknown] - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):279-279.
Errata.[author unknown] - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (3):457-457.
Volume contents.[author unknown] - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (4):591-594.
Editor’s Note.[author unknown] - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (3):337-337.
Editor's Note.[author unknown] - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):1-1.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):241-278.
Instructions for authors.[author unknown] - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (4):587-590.
Call for papers.[author unknown] - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (3):459-459.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-10

Downloads
29 (#780,663)

6 months
8 (#603,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ron Chrisley
University of Sussex

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations