Ecstatic Ontology: Schelling and the Erotics of the Earth

Environment, Space, Place 14 (1):23-52 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:In the following essay I attempt a Schellingian response to the question of what it means to do philosophy in anticipation of civilizational collapse and the end of nature as we know it. As early as 1804 Schelling foresees how the spirit of modernity would lead to what he called “the annihilation of Nature,” but he also advanced a host of ideas that speak directly to our current dilemma. Most importantly for our purposes he held that every significant idea is always as ethical as it is metaphysical: “the highest speculative concepts” must always be “simultaneously the most profound ethical concepts” (II, 3, 67). Ontology, epistemology, logic, aesthetics must all be understood ethically, a point which is seen most clearly in the demand for thoroughgoing systematic unity: the highest speculative concept of unity that must be informed by the most profound ethical experience of the unity of nature which alone can sanctify the positive meaning philosophy must engender if it is to transform human consciousness by increasing awareness of our nature as nature. Such a transformed awareness founds his call for a new way of thinking and doing philosophy that would be as different from the modern as the modern was from the ancient; as ancient referred to the past and, etymologically ‘modern’ denotes the present, he argues for a new way of thinking directed by the ethical tense of the future, in which the absolute becomes the future understood as that which should be (das Seinsollende). To anticipate, I posit the normativity of nature which, as the sustainer of the relational web of the living world, supplies the absolute value to orient humanity’s future. This requires an ecstatic ontology as well as an ethics and epistemology which unite in an erotics of the earth that, by integrating the immediate and sensuous reality of living nature, opens us to a more dynamic way of doing philosophy; one whose primary mode is more haptic than ocular, working by feeling and touch more than abstraction and sight, as it returns love to wisdom and elevates the future to determine the present.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Looking at the World from Istanbul as a Metaphor.Ömer Naci Soykan - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:191-195.
Digital Ontology and the Possibility of Ethics: A Levinasian Response.Harold Wayne Anderson - 1999 - Dissertation, The Iliff School of Theology and University of Denver
Atemporality and the mode of divine knowledge.Gregory Ganssle - 1993 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 34 (3):171 - 180.
An Introduction to Awareness.James M. Corrigan - 2006 - BookSurge Publishing.
The Concept of 'Life' in Early Schelling.Lara Ostaric - 2014 - In Lara Oštarić (ed.), Interpreting Schelling: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 48-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-17

Downloads
31 (#733,571)

6 months
7 (#728,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references