On the Logical Ways to Counter an Argument: A Typology and Some Theoretical Consequences

In Bart Garssen & Frans van Eemeren, From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 149-166 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim here is to give an adequate definition of counterargument, establishing a suitable typology of counterarguments grounded on Toulmin’s model. An argument structure is a combination of arguments with an explicit argumentative orientation, positive, negative or neutral. Counterarguing involves conjoining the criticized and the critical argument into a single argumentation. Therefore, counterargumentation produces argument structures, and a classification of counterarguments is by itself a classification of argument structures.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,987

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argumentation Without Arguments.Henry Prakken - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):171-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-23

Downloads
17 (#1,187,618)

6 months
3 (#1,102,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references