Definability in reducts of algebraically closed fields

Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):188-199 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

LetKbe an algebraically closed field and letLbe itscanonical language; that is,Lconsists of all relations onKwhich are definable from addition, multiplication, and parameters fromK. Two sublanguagesL1andL2ofLaredefinably equivalentif each relation inL1can be defined by anL2-formula with parameters inK, and vice versa. The equivalence classes of sublanguages ofLform a quotient lattice of the power set ofLabout which very little is known. We will not distinguish between a sublanguage and its equivalence class.LetLmdenote the language of multiplication alone, and letLadenote the language of addition alone. Letf∈K[X, Y] and consider thealgebraic functiondefined byf(x, y) = 0 forx, y∈K. LetLfdenote the language consisting of the relation defined byf. The possibilities forLm∨Lfare examined in §2, and the possibilities forLa∨Lfare examined in §3. In fact the only comprehensive results known are under the additional hypothesis thatfactually defines a rational function (i.e., whenfis linear in one of the variables), and in positive characteristic, only expansions of addition by polynomials (i.e., whenfis linear and monic in one of the variables) are understood. It is hoped that these hypotheses will turn out to be unnecessary, so that reasonable generalizations of the theorems described below to algebraic functions will be true. The conjecture is thatLcoversLmand that the only languages betweenLaandLare expansions ofLaby scalar multiplications.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reducts of p-adically closed fields.Eva Leenknegt - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (3-4):285-306.
Cell decomposition for semibounded p-adic sets.Eva Leenknegt - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):667-688.
Defining transcendentals in function fields.Jochen Koenigsmann - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):947-956.
Interpretable groups in Mann pairs.Haydar Göral - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (3-4):203-237.
Direct and local definitions of the Turing jump.Richard A. Shore - 2007 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 7 (2):229-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
238 (#110,408)

6 months
14 (#233,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On Pseudo-Finite Dimensions.Ehud Hrushovski - 2013 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (3-4):463-495.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references