Defining transcendentals in function fields

Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):947-956 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given any field K, there is a function field F/K in one variable containing definable transcendentals over K, i.e., elements in F \ K first-order definable in the language of fields with parameters from K. Hence, the model-theoretic and the field-theoretic relative algebraic closure of K in F do not coincide. E.g., if K is finite, the model-theoretic algebraic closure of K in the rational function field K(t) is K(t). For the proof, diophantine $\emptyset-definability$ of K in F is established for any function field F/K in one variable, provided K is large, or $K^{x}\,/(K^{x})^n$ is finite for some integer n > 1 coprime to char K

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#278,828)

6 months
14 (#232,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The undecidability of pure transcendental extensions of real fields.Raphael M. Robinson - 1964 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 10 (18):275-282.

Add more references