Hegel on recognition: Moral implications of the »lordship and bondage dialectic«

Hegel-Jahrbuch 2008 (1):119-124 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An attempt at moral interpretation of Hegelian 'struggle for recognition'. The Author shows how the Hegelian figures of 'Lord' and 'Bondsman' can be used to explain social role and importance of the idea of tolerance in the context of group moralities and the universal morality. The text is built of three parts: the author sketches the connection of the traditional idea of tolerance and sociological understanding of morality on the basis of Hegel's understanding of recognition. In the second step, he gives an outline of Hegelian two accounts of mutual recognition, finally the author shows the moral dimension of recognition, as referred to the idea of tolerance and universalistic morality.

Other Versions

original Makowski, Piotr (2008) "Hegel on Recognition: Moral Implications of ‘Lordship and Bondage’ Dialectic". Hegel Jahrbuch 0():119-124

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hegelian recognition.György Márkus - 2015 - Thesis Eleven 126 (1):100-122.
The Compatibility of Hegelian Recognition and Morality with the Ethics of Care.Andrew Molas - 2019 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 50 (4):285-304.
Broader contexts of non-domination: Pettit and Hegel on freedom and recognition.Arto Laitinen - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (4):390-406.
Recognition: Personal and political.Thomas Baldwin - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):311-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
14 (#1,289,943)

6 months
3 (#1,491,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references