Why Circular Sets Do Not Evince Circular Dependencies

Analysis (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Circular sets are said to provide clear-cut cases of circular orders of ontological dependence. I argue that this claim is unwarranted given the epistemic parity of two principles of set-dependence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-14

Downloads
5 (#1,774,538)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nuno Maia
University of Salzburg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
The iterative conception of set.George Boolos - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):215-231.

View all 11 references / Add more references