On extensions of supercompactness

&
Mathematical Logic Quarterly 61 (3):217-223 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that, in terms of both implication and consistency strength, an extendible with a larger strong cardinal is stronger than an enhanced supercompact, which is itself stronger than a hypercompact, which is itself weaker than an extendible. All of these are easily seen to be stronger than a supercompact. We also study Cn‐supercompactness.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1002/malq.201400030

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Tallness and level by level equivalence and inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (1):4-12.
Precisely controlling level by level behavior.Arthur W. Apter - 2017 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 63 (1-2):77-84.
On the consistency strength of level by level inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (7-8):715-723.
Reducing the consistency strength of an indestructibility theorem.Arthur W. Apter - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):288-293.
Indestructible strong compactness and level by level inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2013 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 59 (4-5):371-377.
The least measurable can be strongly compact and indestructible.Arthur Apter & Moti Gitik - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1404-1412.
Failure of GCH and the level by level equivalence between strong compactness and supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (6):587.
Supercompactness and level by level equivalence are compatible with indestructibility for strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (3-4):155-163.
More on HOD-supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter, Shoshana Friedman & Gunter Fuchs - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (3):102901.
Supercompactness and measurable limits of strong cardinals II: Applications to level by level equivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):457-463.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
21 (#1,009,308)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On c-extendible cardinals.Konstantinos Tsaprounis - 2018 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (3):1112-1131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

C(n)-cardinals.Joan Bagaria - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (3-4):213-240.
Tall cardinals.Joel D. Hamkins - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (1):68-86.
The large cardinals between supercompact and almost-huge.Norman Lewis Perlmutter - 2015 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (3-4):257-289.
Elementary chains and C (n)-cardinals.Konstantinos Tsaprounis - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (1-2):89-118.
Reducing the consistency strength of an indestructibility theorem.Arthur W. Apter - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):288-293.

View all 6 references / Add more references