The least measurable can be strongly compact and indestructible

&
Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1404-1412 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show the consistency, relative to a supercompact cardinal, of the least measurable cardinal being both strongly compact and fully Laver indestructible. We also show the consistency, relative to a supercompact cardinal, of the least strongly compact cardinal being somewhat supercompact yet not completely supercompact and having both its strong compactness and degree of supercompactness fully Laver indestructible

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2586658

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,641

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Universal partial indestructibility and strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (5):524-531.
More on the Least Strongly Compact Cardinal.Arthur W. Apter - 1997 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (3):427-430.
Indestructible strong compactness and level by level inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2013 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 59 (4-5):371-377.
Indestructibility, instances of strong compactness, and level by level inequivalence.Arthur W. Apter - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (7-8):725-741.
Inner models with large cardinal features usually obtained by forcing.Arthur W. Apter, Victoria Gitman & Joel David Hamkins - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (3-4):257-283.
Patterns of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 89 (2-3):101-115.
The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
Strong Compactness, Square, Gch, and Woodin Cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 2024 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 89 (3):1180-1188.
Laver Indestructibility and the Class of Compact Cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):149-157.
Identity crises and strong compactness III: Woodin cardinals. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (3):307-322.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#266,367)

6 months
16 (#193,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The lottery preparation.Joel David Hamkins - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 101 (2-3):103-146.
Patterns of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 89 (2-3):101-115.
The least strongly compact can be the least strong and indestructible.Arthur W. Apter - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 144 (1-3):33-42.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Patterns of compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 89 (2-3):101-115.

Add more references