On Having Evidence: A Reply to Neta

Logos and Episteme 6 (3): 367-370 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to one line of thought only propositions can be part of one’s evidence, since only propositions can serve the central functions of our ordinary concept of evidence. Ram Neta has challenged this argument. In this paper I respond to Neta’s challenge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Evidence does not equal knowledge.Aaron Rizzieri - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (2):235-242.
Williamson on skepticism and evidence.Richard Fumerton - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):629-635.
Evidence and Knowledge.Clayton Littlejohn - 2011 - Erkenntnis 74 (2):241-262.
Evidentialism: Feldman on Having Evidence.Shawn Graves - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Research 39:265-283.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-30

Downloads
667 (#39,182)

6 months
130 (#39,879)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Artūrs Logins
Université Laval

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What evidence do you have?Ram Neta - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (1):89-119.

Add more references