Logic for equivocators

Noûs 16 (3):431-441 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,756

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ways Things Can't Be.Greg Restall - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):583-596.
Lewis' Argument for Possible Worlds.David Vander Laan - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 76–78.
Lewis on Truth in Fiction.Richard Hanley - 2004 - In Frank Jackson & Graham Priest, Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K. Lewis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 113.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
676 (#43,811)

6 months
17 (#185,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David K. Lewis
PhD: Harvard University; Last affiliation: Princeton University

Citations of this work

Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy.Kevin Dorst - 2019 - Mind 128 (509):175-211.
Why Suspend Judging?Jane Friedman - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):302-326.
The Fragmentation of Belief.Joseph Bendana & Eric Mandelbaum - 2021 - In Cristina Borgoni, Dirk Kindermann & Andrea Onofri, The Fragmented Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 242 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references