The main part and pillar of Berkeley's theory: Idealism and perceptual heterogeneity

Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):91-115 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Berkeley subscribed to the principle of heterogeneity, that what we see is qualitatively and numerically different from what we touch. He says of this principle that it is “the main part and pillar of [his] theory.” The argument I present here is that the theory to which Berkeley refers is not just his theory of vision, but what that theory was the preparation for, which is nothing less than his idealism. The argument turns on the passivity of perception, which is what is at stake in the principle of heterogeneity. The author targeted by Berkeley's theory is Descartes, who explicitly denies heterogeneity

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abstract ideas and the new theory of vision.George S. Pappas - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):55 – 69.
Why we do not see what we feel.Marc A. Hight - 2002 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2):148-162.
Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.Juan R. Loaiza - 2017 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 32 (2):231-247.
Berkeley's Notion of Suggestion.Jody Lynne Graham - 1993 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
A Reiding of Berkeley's Theory of Vision.Hannes Ole Matthiessen - 2022 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 20 (1):19-40.
Catching Berkeley's shadow.Tom Stoneham - 2011 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):116-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-12

Downloads
133 (#166,897)

6 months
3 (#1,484,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Berkeley’s Theory of Perception: Searle Versus Pappas.S. Sreenish - 2024 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 41 (2):259-272.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references