A Defense of Virtual Veridicalism

Dissertation, Western University (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Virtual reality is poised to be increasingly important in our lives. This dissertation investigates the philosophical foundations of virtual reality, probing the metaphysics and epistemology of perceptual experiences of virtual environments. Specifically, it asks 1) what there is in virtual reality and 2) how we perceive virtual things. It defends virtual veridicalism, the view that perceptual experiences in virtual reality are as veridical as ordinary experiences. The defense consists of six chapters. Chapter 1 explains why such questions need to be addressed. Chapter 2 develops a realist view of virtual objects and properties, arguing that virtual objects exist and instantiate properties that may or may not be instantiated by ordinary physical objects. Chapter 3 presents an argument in defense of virtual veridicalism. I argue that the common criterion whereby we consider ordinary experiences veridical justifies the veridicality of perceptual experiences of virtual objects and properties. Chapter 4 looks for a representationalist account of perceptual content that could lend theoretical support to my defense of virtual veridicalism. I argue that none of the currently prominent representationalist views succeed. Rather, Chapter 5 proposes a new account — role representationalism — to achieve the goal. This account claims that, despite some differences in perceptual contents between the virtual and ordinary physical domains, a fundamental aspect of contents remains constant in perceptual experience across both domains, and it is the constant aspect that grounds the veridicality of perceptual experiences of virtual objects and properties. Chapter 6 assesses Chalmers’s (2017) defense of virtual veridicalism and argues that his defense cannot succeed unless presupposing role representationalism as the underlying theory of content of perceptual experiences. Finally, I conclude that 1) there are virtual objects and properties in virtual reality, and 2) we perceive these entities in a way that is as veridical as our perception of ordinary objects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of virtual veridicalism.Yen-Tung Lee - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (12):3477–3498.
The Virtual and the Real.David J. Chalmers - 2017 - Disputatio 9 (46):309-352.
What is Real in Virtual Reality?Paweł Grabarczyk - 2024 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 72 (1):79-98.
Is Chalmers' Virtual Reality "Mirror Argument" Sound?Shaohua Xue - 2022 - Journal of Human Cognition 6 (1):24-32.
Emotion and Ethics in Virtual Reality.Alex Fisher - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Virtual reality, ontology, and value.Norman Mooradian - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (5):673-690.
What are virtual items, and are they real?Rami Ali - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-11.
The Values of the Virtual.Rami Ali - 2023 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 40 (2):231-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-04

Downloads
20 (#1,027,456)

6 months
20 (#141,963)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yen-Tung Lee
Academia Sinica

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references