A Neuroscientist’s Perspective on Debates about the Nature of Emotion

Emotion Review 4 (4):375-379 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The target articles by Dixon (2012), Scarantino (2012), and Mulligan and Scherer (2012) explore the nature of emotion from philosophical and psychological perspectives. I discuss how neuroscience can also contribute to debates about the nature of emotion. I focus on the aspects of emotion that usually fall within the topic of basic emotions, but conclude that we may need to revise how we conceive and study these kinds of emotional states in relation to the brain

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Learning Emotion Concepts.Marina Bakalova - 2021 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):175-180.
Affective memory: a little help from our imagination.Margherita Arcangeli & Jérôme Dokic - 2018 - In Kourken Michaelian, Dorothea Debus & Denis Perrin (eds.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory. New York: Routledge. pp. 139-156.
The Neuroscience of Emotion: A New Synthesis.Ralph Adolphs - 2018 - New York, NY, USA: Princeton University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
60 (#356,604)

6 months
9 (#492,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph LeDoux
New York University