- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
More on Bloor
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (1):71-74 (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
In Science We Trust: Larry Laudan (1941–2022).Stathis Psillos - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (4):523-533.
Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science. Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Jarrett Leplin - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):713-714.
Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. Larry Laudan.Patrick Suppes - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (3):449-451.
Laudan's Progress and Its ProblemsProgress and Its Problems. Larry Laudan.Ernan McMullin - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (4):623-644.
Book Review:Science and Hypothesis Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):653-.
Review of Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science. Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Paul Feyerabend - 1992 - Isis 83 (2):367-368.
Progresso scientifico e naturalismo nella concezione di Larry Laudan.Lapo Ferrarese - 2018 - Pistoia: Petite plaisance.
An alternative to the traditional model? Laudan on disagreement and consensus in science.Andrew Lugg - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (3):419-424.
Sociology of science: Bloor, Collins, Latour.Martin Kusch - 2012 - In James Robert Brown (ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Key Thinkers. New York: Continuum Books. pp. 168.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-08-27
Downloads
30 (#756,477)
6 months
8 (#603,286)
2012-08-27
Downloads
30 (#756,477)
6 months
8 (#603,286)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Philosophical skepticism not relativism is the problem with the Strong Programme in Science Studies and with Educational Constructivism.Dimitris P. Papayannakos - 2008 - Science & Education 17 (6):573-611.
Reasons, causes, and the 'strong programme' in the sociology of knowledge.Warren Schmaus - 1985 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (2):189-196.
The impossibility of finitism: from SSK to ESK?David Tyfield - 2008 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 1 (1):61.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-82spv uwo