Philosophical skepticism not relativism is the problem with the Strong Programme in Science Studies and with Educational Constructivism

Science & Education 17 (6):573-611 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic relativism and the problem of the criterion.Howard Sankey - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):562-570.
Radical constructivism and its failings: Anti‐realism and individualism.Mark Olssen - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):275-295.
Relativism, Incoherence, and the Strong Programme.Harvey Siegel - 2011 - In Richard Schantz & Markus Seidel (eds.), The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge. Lancaster, LA1: ontos. pp. 41-64.
Reply to Amini and Caldwell, “Boghossian’s Refutation of Relativism”.Paul Boghossian - 2012 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 2 (1):45-49.
Rethinking The “strong Programme” In The Sociology Of Knowledge.Adrian Haddock - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):19-40.
Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism.Harry M. Collins - 1981 - Social Studies of Science 11:3-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-06

Downloads
33 (#682,329)

6 months
7 (#698,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?