- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Who Uses the Cost-Benefit Rules of Choice? Implications
In Richard E. Nisbett, Rules for reasoning. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 277 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Who uses the normative rules of choice.R. Larrick, R. Nisbett & J. Morgan - 1993 - In Richard E. Nisbett, Rules for reasoning. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 277--94.
BERARD, TJ,“Rethinking Practices and Structures,” 196. BUNGE, MARIO,“Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Wars by James Robert Brown”[Book Review], 250. COLLINS, RICHARD,“Broadcasting and Convergence. New Articulations of the. [REVIEW]Joseph Agassi - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):523-525.
Out of mind, out of sight. Are minds of Asians and Westerners different?Krzysztof Mudyń - 2011 - Diametros 29:124-127.
Richard E. Morgan, "The Supreme Court and Religion". [REVIEW]Olin J. Murdich - 1975 - The Thomist 39 (3):626.
Stich and Nisbett on justifying inference rules.Earl Conee & Richard Feldman - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (2):326-331.
Review of Richard B. Brandt and Brad Hooker: Rationality, rules, and utility: new essays on the moral philosophy of Richard B. Brandt. [REVIEW]Bruce Russell - 1995 - Ethics 106 (1):189-191.
Richard Swineshead.Edith Dudley Sylla - 2003 - In Jorge J. E. Gracia & Timothy B. Noone, A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 595–596.
The Rules of Critique. Richard Simon and Antoine Arnauld.Martine Pecharman - 2010 - In Maat Bod, The Making of the Humanities I.
A Public Choice Analysis of James M. Buchanan’s Constitutional Project.Randall G. Holcombe - 2018 - In Richard E. Wagner, James M. Buchanan: A Theorist of Political Economy and Social Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 577-602.
James Robert Brown, Who Rules in Science?: An Opinionated Guide to the Wars Reviewed. [REVIEW]K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Philosophy in Review 23 (2):84-86.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-31
Downloads
14 (#1,342,344)
6 months
3 (#1,118,764)
2014-01-31
Downloads
14 (#1,342,344)
6 months
3 (#1,118,764)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Advancing the rationality debate.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):701-717.
Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach.Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Timo Mäntylä & Fabio Del Missier - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (2):69-97.
Individual Differences in Framing and Conjunction Effects.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (4):289-317.
A plea for minimally biased naturalistic philosophy.Andrea Polonioli - 2019 - Synthese 196 (9):3841-3867.
Adaptive Rationality, Biases, and the Heterogeneity Hypothesis.Andrea Polonioli - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (4):787-803.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-6fxz5 uwo