Frege's Notations: What They Are and How They Mean

London and Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gregory Landini offers a detailed historical account of Frege's notations and the philosophical views that led Frege from Begriffssscrhrift to his mature work Grundgesetze, addressing controversial issues that surround the notations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-24

Downloads
35 (#678,037)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Landini
University of Iowa

Citations of this work

Frege on Sense Identity, Basic Law V, and Analysis.Philip A. Ebert - 2016 - Philosophia Mathematica 24 (1):9-29.
Frege on Referentiality and Julius Caesar in Grundgesetze Section 10.Bruno Bentzen - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (4):617-637.
Frege’s Theory of Types.Bruno Bentzen - 2023 - Manuscrito 46 (4):2022-0063.
On the Error of Treating Functions as Objects.Karen Green - 2016 - Analysis and Metaphysics 15:20–35.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Frege’s Puzzle (2nd edition).Nathan U. Salmon - 1986 - Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
Frege's conception of numbers as objects.Crispin Wright - 1983 - [Aberdeen]: Aberdeen University Press.
Sameness and substance.David Wiggins - 1980 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 23 references / Add more references