‘Holding’ and ‘endorsing’ claims in the course of scientific activities

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:89-95 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.05.009

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

'A epistemologia engajada de Hugh Lacey II' - Estudo crítico de 'Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding' (Hugh Lacey).Marcos Olivera - 2000 - Manuscrito 23 (1).
Hugh Lacey is science value free? Values and scientific understanding.Mary Tiles - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):953-955.
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value Free?: Values & Scientific Understanding. Routledge , xiv + 285 pp., $90.00. [REVIEW]Heather Douglas - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):386-389.
Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value Free?: Values & Scientific Understanding. Routledge (1999), xiv, 285 pp., $90.00 (cloth). [REVIEW]Philip Mirowski - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):386-389.
"a Epistemologia Engajada De Hugh Lacey Ii" - Estudo Crítico De "is Science Value Free? Values And Scientific Understanding". [REVIEW]Marcos Barbosa de Oliveira - 2000 - Manuscrito 23 (1):185-203.
Behaviorism, Science, and Human Nature. Barry Schwartz, Hugh Lacey. [REVIEW]Terry L. Smith - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):696-698.
Meeting the challenges to socially responsible science: reply to Brown, Lacey, and Potter.Janet A. Kourany - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):93-103.
Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding.Hugh Lacey - 1999 - New York: Routledge.
Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding, by Hugh Lacey. [REVIEW]Louis Caruana - 2005 - Heythrop Journal 46 (4):587-588.
AN UNSUCCESSFUL DEFENSE OF AN AUTONOMOUS MAN: A Review of Behaviorism, Science, and Human Nature, by Barry Schwartz and Hugh Lacey. Norton: New York. 1982.J. J. McDowell - 1986 - Behaviorism 14 (1):41-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
52 (#421,144)

6 months
4 (#1,263,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh Lacey
Swarthmore College

Citations of this work

Rational endorsement.Will Fleisher - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (10):2649-2675.
Intellectual courage and inquisitive reasons.Will Fleisher - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (4):1343-1371.
Assertion, Nonepistemic Values, and Scientific Practice.Paul L. Franco - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (1):160-180.
Introduction: Cognitive attitudes and values in science.Daniel J. McKaughan & Kevin C. Elliott - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:57-61.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
Douglas on values: From indirect roles to multiple goals.Kevin C. Elliott - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):375-383.

View all 8 references / Add more references