Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value Free?: Values & Scientific Understanding. Routledge (1999), xiv, 285 pp., $90.00 (cloth) [Book Review]

Philosophy of Science 69 (2):386-389 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031824800017517

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hugh Lacey, Is Science Value Free?: Values & Scientific Understanding. Routledge , xiv + 285 pp., $90.00. [REVIEW]Heather Douglas - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):386-389.
Hugh Lacey is science value free? Values and scientific understanding.Mary Tiles - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):953-955.
'A epistemologia engajada de Hugh Lacey II' - Estudo crítico de 'Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding' (Hugh Lacey).Marcos Olivera - 2000 - Manuscrito 23 (1).
"a Epistemologia Engajada De Hugh Lacey Ii" - Estudo Crítico De "is Science Value Free? Values And Scientific Understanding". [REVIEW]Marcos Barbosa de Oliveira - 2000 - Manuscrito 23 (1):185-203.
Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding.Hugh Lacey - 1999 - New York: Routledge.
Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding, by Hugh Lacey. [REVIEW]Louis Caruana - 2005 - Heythrop Journal 46 (4):587-588.
Values and the Conduct of Science: Principles.Hugh Lacey - 1999 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 3 (1):57–86.
Renewing a Conversation on Science and Values: Is Science Value Free?Hugh Lacey - 2001 - Values and Scientific Understanding, Research in Philosophy and Technology 21:337-346.
Hugh Lacey Is Science Value Free?; MWF Stone and Jonathan Wolff (eds.); The Proper Ambition of Science; Eileen Scanlon, Roger Hill and Kirk Junker (eds.); Communicating Science: Professional Contexts; Eileen Scanlon, Elizabeth Whitelegg and Simeon Yates Communicating Science: Contexts and Channels. [REVIEW]F. Moorcroft - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (3):318-320.
Meeting the challenges to socially responsible science: reply to Brown, Lacey, and Potter.Janet A. Kourany - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):93-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-07

Downloads
10 (#1,467,566)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references