The moral perspective of humility

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):249-269 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers have been troubled by the apparent tension between humility and knowledge of one's excellence. However, humility is compatible with knowledge of one's merit because of the moral perspective in which humility is embedded. The perspective has four dimensions: radical dependence, moral comparison with other people, moral ideals, and objective valuation of things in the world. Recourse to this moral perspective also enables clarification of the relationship between humility and other virtues; what is wrong with arrogance; the role of belief of God in humility; and the difference between being humbled and being humiliated.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
41 (#555,703)

6 months
9 (#528,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Kupfer
Iowa State University

References found in this work

Arrogance.Valerie Tiberius & John D. Walker - 1998 - American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (4):379 - 390.
Humility.Nancy E. Snow - 1995 - Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):203-216.
Is Humility a Virtue?Norvin Richards - 1988 - American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (3):253 - 259.

Add more references