- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items
Rodrigo Schames Kreitchmann, Francisco J. Abad, Vicente Ponsoda, Maria Dolores Nieto & Daniel Morillo
Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to examine global and specific factors in measures of sports coaches' interpersonal styles.Andreas Stenling, Andreas Ivarsson, Peter Hassmén & Magnus Lindwall - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6:154492.
Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.Yue Xiao, Hongyun Liu & Hui Li - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019. [REVIEW]Andrew T. Jebb, Vincent Ng & Louis Tay - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Modified Logistic Regression Approaches to Eliminating the Impact of Response Styles on DIF Detection in Likert-Type Scales.Hui-Fang Chen, Kuan-Yu Jin & Wen-Chung Wang - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire : Psychometric Analysis Using a Forced Choice Thurstonian IRT Model.Josef Merk, Wolff Schlotz & Thomas Falter - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Application of Asymmetric IRT Modeling to Discrete-Option Multiple-Choice Test Items.Daniel M. Bolt, Sora Lee, James Wollack, Carol Eckerly & John Sowles - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
The Shame and Guilt Scales of the Test of Self-Conscious Affect-Adolescent : Psychometric Properties for Responses from Children, and Measurement Invariance Across Children and Adolescents.Shaun D. Watson, Rapson Gomez & Eleonora Gullone - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Evidence of Factorial Validity of Parental Knowledge, Control and Solicitation, and Adolescent Disclosure Scales: When the Ordered Nature of Likert Scales Matters.Francesca Lionetti, Loes Keijsers, Antonio Dellagiulia & Massimiliano Pastore - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Editorial: Controlling psychometric measures for method effects by means of factor analysis.Christine DiStefano, Karl Schweizer & Stefan Troche - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Free, forced, and restricted recall in verbal learning.Walter Ritter & Herman Buschke - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1204.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-10-15
Downloads
20 (#1,099,492)
6 months
2 (#1,316,056)
2019-10-15
Downloads
20 (#1,099,492)
6 months
2 (#1,316,056)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Metacognitive Awareness Scale, Domain Specific (MCAS-DS): Assessing Metacognitive Awareness During Raven’s Progressive Matrices.John H. H. Song, Sasha Loyal & Benjamin Lond - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-s277s uwo